Posts by Island Man

~ "The hypocritical Jewish religious leaders also considered the apostle Paul to be an apostate. And I bet they also considered Jesus to be an apostate."

~ "Is that how you deal with the unpleasant fact that you can't refute what I'm saying - by resorting to childish name-calling?"

~ "An apostate is one who leaves true christianity - that would include one who despises what the bible actually says to follow a hierarchical man-made organization spreading falsehoods and lording it over the sheep."

~ "No I'm just following the advice of 2 Timothy 3:5 which helped me realize that I should turn away from hypocritical religious organizations."

34

RELIGION AND MENTAL ILLNESS!!!

by ADJUSTMENTS in

jw
friends

i have have come to realize most "rank and file" jw's are mentally unstable-to-ill and here is why.... http://www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/mental-issues.php.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/religious_delusion.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/religion_and_schizophrenia.

Island Man

I think that irrational, faith based religion is itself a form of mental illness - a form of induced mass delusion. Admittedly, it may not be mental illness is the way mental illness is conventionally thought of and defined. But that is only because the very pervasive nature of religion and its wielding of great political clout in recent history has prejudiced the medical community against calling the spade a spade, so to speak.

53

Need to vent: Wife just went in full cult mode, huge fight. she is so brainwashed

by goingthruthemotions in

jw
friends

out of the blue my wife started to ask me about my feeling about the borg.

i told her i didn't want to talk about it...she persisted.

she already knows how i feel, i told her that my biggest beef is that they use mind control, and yep she went in to how i was an apostate and how she doesn't want to be married to an apostate.

Island Man

Heisenburg: Jesus made whose name known?

When deciding what a christian should focus on in his preaching efforts, Jesus' direct instructions to his followers take precedence over what Jesus himself did. Jesus told his followers that they were to be witnesses of him and throughout the book of Acts and even the book of Revelation there are passages that highlight that early Christians were witnesses of Jesus. Not that christians aren't to also witness about God. The point is witnessing about Jesus should be prominent on the agenda quite unlike what the JWs are doing. Jesus direct instructions and the example of faithful 1st century christians recorded in the book of Acts speak volumes showing clearly that christians give prominence to witnessing about Jesus. When it comes to the prominence of Jesus in the message being preached, JWs are strangers to the first century christianity revealed in scripture.

Although christians are followers of christ, not everything Jesus did is to be done by his followers to the same extent and degree. Jesus' role in bearing witness about his father was a unique one because of Jesus unique position as one who had first hand information about God that no other human had. The same cannot be said about christians today. So you can't use the fact that Jesus made God's name known - i.e. God's true character and reputation - as a basis for claiming christians are to spend 99.9% of their time witnessing about God's literal name and 0.1% witnessing about Jesus. How ridiculous! Jesus healed the sick and raised the dead. Why aren't JWs doing that?

Also, Jesus didn't only preach about his Father. Jesus also preached a lot about himself, speaking about himself in the third person as "the Son of Man", "God's son", etc. Go read the gospels - really read them, with an open mind, free of Watchtower preconceptions - and see for yourself where Jesus often preached about himself telling people to come follow him, that he is the light of the world, etc. Even though he made his father's true character known, Jesus also preached about himself - to a greater degree than JWs today preach about him. JWs should be ashamed of themselves for their shoddy treatment of Jesus.

16

Estimation for people who have lived since Adam

by James Mixon in

69-110 billion, 90% of the people who've ever lived are dead.

that's a lot of folks to be resurrected.

take away we who are apostates (a million or two) that still leave 67-110 billion.. raining down manna from heaven will not cut the mustard for 100 billion people, there is not much you can do with manna, manna bread, manna tacos, manna soup and manna sweet cakes.. there is not enough resources to to house and feed 100 billion people, 7-8 billion today.. i'am not a economist or mathematician but the resurrection will create a whole set of new problems for mankind.. it becomes a bigger problem when you figure in those folks the lived before adam that the bible forgot to mention..

Island Man

Which 'Adam' are we talking about...or 'Eve'?
the numbers would be lower by far if you are only counting from 4,000 (+a few) years ago. But if you are counting from 'Eve out of Africa' then 108,000,000 doesn't sound too high.

I agree with fiddler. If you got that estimate from a secular source then it is likely based on the fact that humans have been in existence for a lot longer than the 6040 years that JWs claim humans have been around for. In that case, the JWs can just dismiss that figure as being in error without having to explain how that many people can be resurrected. You can't use population projections based on the true duration of human existence to refute the logistical feasibility of the JWs resurrection belief which they have devised within the context of their erroneous young-humankind bible chronology.

68

What I Saw & Heard in the Oral Argument Hearing on January 14, 2015

by ABibleStudent in

im not an attorney and i could not record the hearing, so please forgive me if i make mistakes in relating what i remember of the oral argument hearing for jane doe (i.e., candace conti) versus the watchtower bible & tract society on january 14, 2015 and the length of this post.. i arrived at the civic center/union plaza in san francisco, ca about 7:30. the area is very nice with a few homeless people sleeping in the park across from the courthouse.

it took me about 10 minutes to find the clerks office for the court on the first floor, which opened at 8:00.. once the clerks office opened, the two clerks who i talked with were very polite and helpful.

the arguments for jane doe (i.e., candace conti) versus the watchtower bible & tract society were scheduled 5th out of (i think) 8. while i was in the office a cameraman and another person for nbc arrived asking about the hearing for candace contis case.. the courtroom for the 1st appellate court is on the 4th floor and takes up most of that floor.

Island Man

Wouldn't the Shepherd book (elder's manual) and confidential letter to bodies of elders giving them instructions on matters, show that a "special relationship" exists between Watchtower and local congregations?

10

How would they explain this one?

by StarTrekAngel in

while there is plenty of pressure for young jws to refrain from every act of premarital sex, self pleasuring or by engaging with others, there isn't a whole lot of advice on the bible regarding this aspect.

i have just recently began to wonder about it so the only thing i can recall regarding this on the scriptures, is the famous words recorded in 1 cor 7:39 or any other paragraph that speaks against sexual immorality.

however, i came across deut 21:10. check it out.

Island Man

The bible is a very misogynistic book and one of the areas that its misogyny is especially evident is in the area of sexuality. Here's why I say this:

1. From reading the Law, one gets the impression that adultery is always a sin against the husband and never a sin against the wife. The Law makes provision for a husband who suspects his wife of adultery, to bring her before the priests for a holy water trial. There is no such provision for the wife who suspects her husband of adultery.

The story of Mary's miraculous impregnation also seems to indirectly hint at adultery being a sin against the man. How so? Under the law adultery is supposed to be a capitol offence punishable by death. But when Joseph found out Mary was pregnant (presumably by another man), the bible says he decided to divorce her secretly because he was righteous. How could he be righteous for failing to report a capitol offence? Well, it seems like its only a capitol offence if the offended party - the husband - does not forgive the unfaithful wife. Now if adultery was a capitol offence period, regardless of the husband's forgiveness, then Joseph would have been duty bound to report Mary's crime and would not be considered righteous for failing to do so.

2. Polygamy is permissible but polyandry (a woman with multiple husbands) is not. A woman's right to be the sole, exclusive object of a man's romantic affection is not respected as the man can choose to have other women. But the man's right to be a woman's sole, exclusive object of romantic affection is enforced with the penalty of death. Sexual fidelity, under the Law, is all about pleasing the man, and adultery is all about stealing the man's sex toy behind his back. It has nothing to do with how women feel and their sexual needs.

23

When they ask in exasperation; "But what if it IS the Truth?"

by nicolaou in

this is how robert ingersoll responded to a fundamentalist's question, 'what if it's the truth?

' back in the 19th century.

"why," they say to me, "suppose all this should turn out to be true, and you should come to the day of judgement and find all these things to be true.

Island Man

"But what if it IS the truth?"

To that I will respond:

"But what if it is NOT the truth? What if you're worshipping the wrong God? What if you're worshipping the right God in the wrong way? Given that there are so many different religions with conflicting beliefs and Gods, the odds that you have the right one is very slim. If there really is just one God who must be worshipped in one particular way to earn is favor, then mathematically speaking, you have odds of winning his favor that's not very much better than zero. And what kind of God causes or allows such a state of religious confusion to persist in the world, with no definitive, objective evidence of his existence, making it very hard to figure out exactly which way he is to be worshipped or to be certain that he exists at all, and then turns around and damns people for not getting it right? Certainly not a God worthy of worship!"

27

Experience in a talk

by Da.Furious in

last week we had an elder giving a talk, cant remember the title.. the thing that was of interest is the experience he gave:.

"a brother who was working in a hospital had to leave his job which was paying him good money because the nurses wanted to sleep with him and they kept putting notes for him on his desk!".

this is not the first time i hear similar experience.

Island Man

Watchtower tends to use the most extreme experiences that don't really represent what is typical.

One time during a talk where the brother was discouraging marriage to unbelievers he gave an experience of a sister who married an unbeliever who turned out to be a secret bestialist and he passed on to her some loathsome STD that he contracted from a dog. Is that typically what happens when a JW marries an unbeliever? No. But an experience like that serves to terrorize JWs into not marrying unbelievers.